Current:Home > FinanceThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -消息
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-08 14:59:23
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5847)
Related
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Lift Your Face in Just 5 Minutes and Save $80 on the NuFace Toning Device on Prime Day 2023
- How Gas Stoves Became Part of America’s Raging Culture Wars
- Drowning Deaths Last Summer From Flooding in Eastern Kentucky’s Coal Country Linked to Poor Strip-Mine Reclamation
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Biden Administration Allows Controversial Arctic Oil Project to Proceed
- In Dimock, a Pennsylvania Town Riven by Fracking, Concerns About Ties Between a Judge and a Gas Driller
- Why Kristin Davis Really Can't Relate to Charlotte York
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Q&A: Cancer Alley Is Real, And Louisiana Officials Helped Create It, Researchers Find
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Selena Quintanilla's Husband Chris Perez Reunites With Her Family After Resolving Legal Dispute
- Be the Host With the Most When You Add These 18 Prime Day Home Entertaining Deals to Your Cart
- Shawn Johnson Weighs In On Her Cringe AF Secret Life of the American Teenager Cameo
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Save 30% on the TikTok-Loved Grande Cosmetics Lash Serum With 29,900+ 5-Star Reviews on Prime Day 2023
- Pittsburgh Selects Sustainable Startups Among a New Crop of Innovative Businesses
- Twice as Much Land in Developing Nations Will be Swamped by Rising Seas than Previously Projected, New Research Shows
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
After Cutting Off Water to a Neighboring Community, Scottsdale Proposes a Solution
Striking actors and studios fight over control of performers' digital replicas
Texas Oilfield Waste Company Contributed $53,750 to Regulators Overseeing a Controversial Permit Application
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Texas Regulators Won’t Stop an Oilfield Waste Dump Site Next to Wetlands, Streams and Wells
Ambitious Climate Proposition Faces Fossil Fuel Backlash in El Paso
Pennsylvania Environmental Officials Took 9 Days to Inspect a Gas Plant Outside Pittsburgh That Caught Fire on Christmas Day